Abstract
Video abstracts have been proposed as a tool to disseminate research through to social networks. However, its association with metrics of research dissemination has not been adequately investigated, particularly in the field of medical research. The aim of this study was to assess the association between video abstracts and citations, views and Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) of research papers. A cross-sectional study of research reports published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) over a 3-year period was conducted. An inverse binomial regression was used to assess factors associated with citations, views and AAS. The model included the presence of video abstracts as well as other independent covariables as potential confounding factors. 500 research reports were included in the analysis and 152 benefited from a video abstract. The median time from publication was 3.0 (2.2 to 3.6) years and 72% were RCTs. Research reports published with a video abstract were associated with an increase in citations (IRR 1.15), although this estimate came with uncertainty ranging from virtually no effect to a worthwhile effect (95% CI 0.98 to 1.35). There were also associated with a worthwhile increase in views (IRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.54) as well as with an increase in AAS (IRR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.44). To conclude, video abstracts are associated with a worthwhile increase in the number of views of research reports. They are also associated with an increase in citations and social attention, although the association may be small.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All the authors have read and approved submission of the manuscript and the manuscript has not been published and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in whole or part in any language.
References
Aggarwal, V. (2021). Visual abstracts do not increase some impact scores more than conventional abstracts of clinical research: A retrospective cohort study. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 30, 259–267.
Altmetric. (2020). What is Altmetric and what does it provide? Retrieved March 23, 2022, from https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000232837-what-is-altmetric-and-what-does-it-provide-.
Altmetric. (2021). How is the Altmetric Attention Score calculated? Retrieved March 23, 2022, from https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000233311-how-is-the-altmetric-attention-score-calculated-.
Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared decision making–pinnacle of patient-centered care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 780–781.
Bredbenner, K., & Simon, S. M. (2019). Video abstracts and plain language summaries are more effective than graphical abstracts and published abstracts. PLoS ONE, 14(11), e0224697.
Brossard, D. (2013). New media landscapes and the science information consumer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 20(110 Suppl 3), 14096–14101.
Callaway, E. (2016). Publishing elite turns against impact factor. Nature, 535, 210–211.
Carvalho, F. A., Elkins, M. R., Franco, M. R., & Pinto, R. Z. (2019). Are plain-language summaries included in published reports of evidence about physiotherapy interventions? Analysis of 4421 randomised trials, systematic reviews and guidelines on the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Physiotherapy, 105(3), 354–361.
Health NIo. Plain Language at NIH 2022 (2022, 24 March). https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director/office-communications-public-liaison/clear-communication/plain-language.
Hook, D. W., Porter, S. J., & Herzog, C. (2018). Dimensions: Building context for search and evaluation. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3, 23.
Hub, B. A. Writing and formatting - Video abstracts 2022. https://authors.bmj.com/writing-and-formatting/video-abstracts/.
Kulkarni, A. V., Busse, J. W., & Shams, I. (2007). Characteristics associated with citation rate of the medical literature. PLoS ONE, 2(5), e403.
Lee, K. P., Schotland, M., Bacchetti, P., & Bero, L. A. (2002). Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA, 287(21), 2805–2808.
Moorhead, S. A., Hazlett, D. E., Harrison, L., Carroll, J. K., Irwin, A., & Hoving, C. (2013). A new dimension of health care: Systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(4), e85.
Oska, S., Lerma, E., & Topf, J. (2020). A picture is worth a thousand views: A triple crossover trial of visual abstracts to examine their impact on research dissemination. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(12), e22327.
Otten, J. J., Cheng, K., & Drewnowski, A. (2015). Infographics and public policy: Using data visualization to convey complex information. Health Affairs (millwood)., 34(11), 1901–1907.
Patthi, B., Prasad, M., Gupta, R., Singla, A., Kumar, J. K., Dhama, K., et al. (2017). Altmetrics-A collated adjunct beyond citations for scholarly impact: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(6), 16–20.
Peters, H. P., Dunwoody, S., Allgaier, J., Lo, Y. Y., & Brossard, D. (2014). Public communication of science 20: Is the communication of science via the “new media” online a genuine transformation or old wine in new bottles? EMBO Reports, 15(7), 749–753.
Pushparajah, D. S., Manning, E., Michels, E., & Arnaudeau-Begard, C. (2018). Value of developing plain language summaries of scientific and clinical articles: A survey of patients and physicians. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 52(4), 474–481.
Spicer, S. (2014). Exploring video abstracts in science journals: An overview and case study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(2), e1110.
Stacey, D., Legare, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., et al. (2017). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD001431.
Thoma, B., Murray, H., Huang, S. Y. M., Milne, W. K., Martin, L. J., Bond, C. M., et al. (2018). The impact of social media promotion with infographics and podcasts on research dissemination and readership. CJEM, 20(2), 300–306.
Trueger, N. S., Thoma, B., Hsu, C. H., Sullivan, D., Peters, L., & Lin, M. (2015). The Altmetric Score: A new measure for article-level dissemination and impact. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 66(5), 549–553.
Vaghjiani, N. G., Lal, V., Vahidi, N., Ebadi, A., Carli, M., Sima, A., et al. (2021). Social media and academic impact: Do early Tweets correlate with future citations? Ear, Nose, and Throat Journal, 25, 1455613211042113.
Zong, Q., Xie, Y., Tuo, R., Huang, J., & Yang, Y. (2019). The impact of video abstract on citation counts: Evidence from a retrospective cohort study of New Journal of Physics. Scientometrics, 119(3), 1715–1727.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by ADIR Association.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TB, AR, JL, LS, MOF has made substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; TB, AR. has drafted the submitted article or revised it critically for important intellectual content; TB, AR, FEG, JL, LS, JFM, AC, MOF. has provided final approval of the version to be published; TB, AR, FEG, JL, LS, JFM, AC, MOF has agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Tristan BONNEVIE declares receiving grants from Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, personal fee from Asten Santé and other from KerNel Biomedical, unrelated to this study. None of the other authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Registration
Not applicable.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bonnevie, T., Repel, A., Gravier, FE. et al. Video abstracts are associated with an increase in research reports citations, views and social attention: a cross-sectional study. Scientometrics 128, 3001–3015 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04675-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04675-9